adoseoftheosis
Spirituality/Belief • Lifestyle • Books
I'm interested in the ministry of reconciliation (2 Corinthians 5:18)

I'm an Orthodox Christian who has found a lovely, sparsely populated corner of the internet where Catholics and Orthodox can discuss the apostolic witness in a way befitting a Christian.

Together we'll share ideas, study a variety of things (patristics, Scripture, saints, books, etc.), and pray with/for one another.

Healing has to take place when brokenhearted, separated people spend time together.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Coffee, Canon, and Conscience:A Theological Dialogue on Scripture, Tradition, and Authority

Characters:
• Sola Hobbes – Protestant. Scripture-centered, historically informed, cautious of institutional overreach.
• Thomas Traditio – Roman Catholic. Doctrinally structured, historically grounded, magisterially confident.
• Theo Dox – Eastern Orthodox. Mystical, liturgical, rooted in the Fathers and councils. Speaks English with a noticeable but gentle Greek-Slavic accent.

Setting:
A quiet university café. One of those tucked-away corners where ideas ferment in the steam of cheap espresso and theological tension. Mugs clink beside worn books. The smell of roasted beans is strong—but someone swears they smell incense too.

Narrator’s Note:
I wasn’t supposed to be listening. I was supposed to be sending emails. But when you’re a businessman on the road, café WiFi is home, and sometimes a conversation at the next table grabs you by the soul. Sola Hobbes, Thomas Traditio, and Theo Dox. I don’t know if those were their real names. But they spoke like they meant it. Not like debate team kids—but like people trying to hold onto something that might slip away.

Sola Hobbes (stirring his coffee): I know you both are excited about the new pope, but we should begin where the apostles began—with the Word. Scripture is theopneustos, God-breathed, and fully sufficient to train, correct, teach. That’s 2 Timothy 3:16–17, and the Reformers took that seriously. They spoke of the perspicuity of Scripture—not that every passage is crystal clear, but that the essentials are. Sure, the early Church had traditions. But once the canon was complete, sola scriptura became necessary. All tradition must be tested against Scripture. The Bereans did it. The Reformers followed suit.

Thomas Traditio (noting, with a half-smile): Yes, the Bereans were noble because they searched the Scriptures. But what were they searching? The Old Testament. And once they saw Christ in it, they submitted to apostolic preaching. That same apostolic authority passed down more than just texts. Paul says in 2 Thessalonians 2:15 to “hold fast to the traditions”—both spoken and written. Scripture and Tradition aren’t competitors. They’re two lungs of the same Body.

Theo Dox (gently nodding): And the Body, she breathes through more than books, yes? Before ink was dry on even one Gospel, Church already gather—breaking bread, chanting Psalms, living faith. Basil the Great, he says, “Some teachings we have from Scripture, others from tradition of apostles.” Papacy aside… both are river of grace. Both needed.

Sola Hobbes (leans back): And yet, rivers can overflow. Take relics, for example. Whole economies formed around bones. People kissed shrines, bought indulgences, and hoped for a shortcut through purgatory. Luther didn’t wake up angry. He watched the system implode. Scripture doesn’t need to be managed like that. It anchors us when tradition overreaches.

Thomas Traditio: True, but let’s not confuse doctrine with its distortions. The Church distinguishes latria, worship due to God alone, from dulia, the honor shown to saints—and hyperdulia, uniquely for Mary. Abuse doesn’t nullify right use. That’s why Trent addressed indulgence abuses and clarified doctrines. The Spirit leads the Church not into confusion but correction, eventually.

Theo Dox: Veneration, when rightly ordered, is not superstition. No, is steeped in Holy Scripture. Revelation 5:8—elders offering incense, prayers of the saints before the Lamb. This is not distraction. This is intercession. And at Council of Nicaea II, icons defended because of Incarnation. John of Damascus, he say, “I do not worship matter. I worship God who became matter.” That… that is Incarnation in color.

Sola Hobbes (quiet now, more honest than sharp): I’m not just pushing paper doctrines here. I watched a pastor I trusted manipulate people. Use “the Spirit” to silence dissent. Twist Scripture into guilt. I know Scripture can be misused—but it was the last unshattered window in the house when everything else burned down. That’s why I cling to it.

Thomas Traditio (his voice low): You think I haven’t been shaken? The Avignon papacy. The abuse crisis. Watching people I love walk away because leaders failed them. I’ve wondered if we built this thing on sand. But every time I tried to leave, I ran into saints. Quiet, faithful ones. And somehow I knew—I’m not following a structure. I’m following a Church that bled and still bled grace. One must judge the effectiveness of a medication by those who actually follow its prescription (Catholics call those folks Saints), and not by those who choose to disregard the prescription but yet publicly proclaim they are prescribed the medication.

Theo Dox: Eh… none of us has perfect system. Even Orthodoxy—she forgets sometimes, yes? Is why Church must sing. Not to perform—but to remember. Spirit, He still breathe. In Scripture, yes, but also in bread… and in body.

Sola Hobbes: So what happens when your interpretive body gets it wrong? What if the Magisterium missteps? Popes have contradicted each other. Some councils have reversed. Sola scriptura gives us a prophetic check. Like the apostles before the Sanhedrin: “We must obey God rather than men.”

Thomas Traditio: But who decides what the Scripture means? Even the devil quoted it to Christ. When disputes arise, we need a final interpretive authority. That’s why Christ gave Peter the keys—to bind and loose. And the early Church didn’t just write Scripture. It recognized the canon within apostolic succession. Irenaeus reminds us: “The tradition of the apostles is manifest in every Church throughout the world.”

Theo Dox: Tradition—this we guard not by one man, but by mind of Church. Liturgy, saints, councils… they are not decoration. They are memory. Divine Liturgy—it does not only protect faith. It teach us how to suffer it, how to live it.

Sola Hobbes: But if the Church defines Scripture and Scripture defines the Church, isn’t that a loop I can’t escape?

Thomas Traditio: Only if you imagine Scripture hovering above the Church like a book dropped from the sky. But the Church—guided by the Spirit—discerned the canon. You trust the list of books in your Bible… but not the council that gave it to you? How can you squeeze infallible Bible juice out of a fallible Catholic orange?

Theo Dox: Tell me, Sola—how you know Hebrews is Scripture, but Shepherd of Hermas, no? Hebrews, she does not say, “I am canon.” No. Is Church who remembered. Is Church who prayed with it, who fasted with it. This is how she knows.

Sola Hobbes: Because God’s providence worked through flawed men to recognize His Word. Apostolic authorship, theological consistency, fulfilled prophecy—that’s how the canon authenticates itself. The Reformers didn’t despise tradition. They just refused to let it rule the Word.

Thomas Traditio: And we agree. But the Word was never meant to be read alone. Scripture, Tradition, and Magisterium form a threefold cord. Untwist one, and the whole frays.

Theo Dox: Or fractures. Protestantism’s strength is also its wound. Thousands of communities, each holding the same Bible, each sounding different. In Orthodoxy, we do not just quote Scripture—we chant it, we fast it, we bleed with it. We remember by becoming, da? We do not just read Bible. We are Bible, if we are honest.

Sola Hobbes (sipping slowly): So maybe the real question isn’t “Is Scripture enough?” Maybe it’s “How do I know what the apostles meant when they wrote it?”

Thomas Traditio: Or, “Who did they trust to carry that meaning forward when they were gone?”

Theo Dox: Or… maybe, what kind of Church still remembers how to weep like them?

Narrator’s Note: They didn’t settle it. Just sat there with their hands on ceramic, staring into the swirl of cooling coffee. It didn’t feel like a debate anymore. More like confession. Or maybe liturgy in disguise. I shut my laptop. WiFi was unreliable anyway. I used to argue like Sola. Same verses. Same certainty. There’s still a part of me that wants to reach across the table and say, you’re not wrong—but you’re not home, either. I didn’t say it. Just walked out into the wind, the smell of espresso still caught in the fibers of my jacket. Something stayed with me. Not the answers. Just that low, holy ache.

Postscript: A Closing Reflection
The Christian Church was born without a New Testament in hand—just the Spirit, the apostles, and a memory. The Gospels hadn’t been penned yet. Paul’s letters were still ink on parchment in scattered homes and hearts. And yet the Church flourished—gathered, baptized, broke bread, worshipped. Scripture came later, canonized through worship and tradition—not dropped from the sky. But today? We’re more divided than ever over who has the right to interpret that same Scripture, and what role tradition, authority, and conscience should play. Everyone’s appealing to the same verses—but coming away with different gospels. This dialogue wasn’t about flattening those differences. It wasn’t interested in caricatures. Each voice spoke with weight. The point wasn’t to win, but to sit in the tension long enough to ask: How do we know what the apostles meant? What exactly did they hand on? And who guards that memory now? Because maybe the yearning to know is the very proof that something was handed down—and not everything God builds fits neatly in a book… even an inerrant one (cf. John 21:25).

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
Happy Palm Sunday! 🌿

This is one of my favorite hymns of the year

00:00:27
Merry (old calendar) Christmas!

Christ is born! Glorify Him!

00:00:29
Forgot the scorpion vid 🦂
00:00:45
Happy Mother’s Day ❤️🌸🙏🌹🌻

Happy Mother’s Day to all you beautiful mommas out there! Where would we be without you? Each and every one of you are a precious gift 💝

May our Lord’s mother, the mother of us all protect and pray for you all your days!

post photo preview
Pope Leo XIV

I don't know anything about him. What are everyone's thoughts?

No matter what, I continue to pray for the Church at large and for unity and the beautiful will of our beautiful Lord to be done 🙏

May 07, 2025

Post any photo that belongs in an Eastern Theology of home book. (see Carrie Gress' theology of home for the western (photoshopped) version

post photo preview
What is the Coptic Calendar?

The Coptic calendar is one of the oldest systems still in use today, carrying thousands of years of history and tradition. Rooted in ancient Egyptian timekeeping, it’s been adapted by the Coptic Orthodox Church to mark liturgical seasons, feast days, and the commemoration of saints. Known as the Anno Martyrum (A.M.) calendar, or “Year of the Martyrs,” it’s a unique blend of Egypt’s ancient heritage and the Christian faith, reflecting the Coptic Church’s deep respect for both time and sacrifice.

Origins of the Coptic Calendar: Ancient Egyptian Roots

The origins of the Coptic calendar trace back to the ancient Egyptian civil calendar, which was one of the earliest systems developed to organize time. This calendar, known as the Egyptian solar calendar, was based on a 365-day year, divided into three agricultural seasons: Akhet (the inundation or flood season), Peret (the planting season), and Shemu (the harvest season). Each season had four months, making a total of twelve 30-day months. At the end of the year, five additional “epagomenal” days were added to reach 365 days.

The transition from this ancient Egyptian calendar to the Coptic calendar came about as Christianity spread throughout Egypt. In the year 284 AD, the Copts adopted this calendar system and transformed it into what’s now known as the Anno Martyrum calendar to honor the memory of martyrs persecuted under Emperor Diocletian, whose reign is remembered for its severe persecution of Christians. The year 284 was chosen as the beginning of the Coptic calendar, marking the start of a time that would see thousands of Christians martyred for their faith.

 

 

Structure of the Coptic Calendar: Months and Seasons

The Coptic calendar remains quite similar to its ancient Egyptian predecessor, with a few additions for liturgical purposes:

  • Months: The calendar year is divided into 12 months, each containing exactly 30 days, followed by a “small month” known as Pi Kogi Enavot (or the “Little Month”), which has five days in a common year and six days in a leap year.

  • Names of the Months: Each month has its own name derived from ancient Egyptian, reflecting the agricultural rhythms of the Nile Valley:

    1. Thout
    2. Paopi
    3. Hathor
    4. Kiahk
    5. Tobe
    6. Meshir
    7. Paremhat
    8. Paremoude
    9. Pashons
    10. Paoni
    11. Epip
    12. Mesori

The names reflect the agricultural and seasonal nature of the calendar, linking each month to the ancient Egyptian way of life.

  • The Little Month: At the end of Mesori, there are five or six additional days, known as the “Little Month.” In leap years, it’s extended to six days, aligning the calendar to the solar year.

Liturgical Seasons in the Coptic Calendar

The Coptic calendar is foundational for the liturgical life of the Coptic Orthodox Church, guiding the dates of fasts, feasts, and commemorations. Some of the key liturgical seasons include:

  1. The Season of Advent (Nativity Fast): This fast begins on the 16th of Hathor and continues until the Feast of the Nativity on the 29th of Kiahk (January 7th in the Gregorian calendar). The fast spans 43 days, calling the faithful to a period of preparation and spiritual reflection before Christmas.

  2. The Season of Great Lent: The dates for Lent vary each year, but the season traditionally falls around the month of Meshir, leading up to the Feast of the Resurrection, or Easter.

  3. Kiahk: Known as the “Month of Praise,” Kiahk is dedicated to preparations for the birth of Christ. Churches hold special services featuring hymns, praises, and the unique melodies of the Coptic heritage, inviting the faithful into a deeper sense of anticipation for the Nativity.

  4. Holy Week (Pascha): Holy Week, or Pascha, is the most sacred time of the year in the Coptic Church. The dates are determined by the Coptic calendar and fall near the months of Paremhat or Paremoude. It’s a week of intense fasting, prayer, and reflection on the events of Christ’s Passion, culminating in the celebration of the Resurrection.

  5. The Fast of the Apostles: This fast honors the early apostles of the Church, beginning the day after Pentecost (the Feast of the Descent of the Holy Spirit) and lasting until the Feast of St. Peter and St. Paul on the 5th of Epip.

Major Feasts and Commemorations

The Coptic calendar is punctuated with major feasts, some of which align with the broader Christian calendar, while others are unique to the Coptic tradition:

  1. The Feast of Nayrouz: This is the Coptic New Year, celebrated on the first day of Thout (around September 11 or 12 in the Gregorian calendar). The Feast of Nayrouz is not only the start of the Coptic year but also a commemoration of the martyrs who gave their lives for their faith, especially during the era of Diocletian. It’s a day of both celebration and solemn remembrance.

  2. Feast of the Nativity: Celebrated on 29 Kiahk, the Coptic Christmas on January 7th, this feast marks the birth of Jesus Christ. Copts prepare with fasting, special prayers, and a midnight liturgy to celebrate the Incarnation.

  3. The Feast of the Resurrection (Easter): Celebrated after the 55-day Great Lent, Easter is the highest feast in the Coptic calendar, commemorating Christ’s victory over death and the hope of salvation for all humanity.

  4. The Feast of the Cross: Celebrated twice a year—on the 17th of Thout and again on the 10th of Paremhat—the Feast of the Cross honors the discovery of the true cross by St. Helena. The cross holds a place of special significance in Coptic spirituality, seen as the ultimate symbol of Christ’s sacrifice and love.

Spiritual Significance of the Coptic Calendar

The Coptic calendar is more than a timekeeping tool; it’s a rhythm of spiritual life. The calendar’s liturgical seasons and feast days help believers journey through the life of Christ, the saints, and the Church’s rich heritage. The saints are honored throughout the year on their feast days, allowing Coptic Christians to connect with those who came before them, especially those who lived and died for their faith.

By structuring life around fasting, feasting, and commemoration, the Coptic calendar fosters a sense of timelessness, anchoring believers in the past, present, and future of their faith. Each day is marked by a saint or event, a reminder that each moment holds a connection to something larger than oneself.

Conclusion: A Timeless Tradition

The Coptic calendar is a testament to the resilience and devotion of the Coptic Orthodox Church. By following the rhythms of this ancient calendar, Copts connect with a tradition that goes back millennia, linking their faith to the legacy of their ancestors and honoring the memory of those who sacrificed for their beliefs. This calendar, grounded in ancient Egypt but redefined by Christian faith, is a profound reminder of God’s presence throughout history and an invitation to live each day with faith, discipline, and gratitude.

 

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
A Light in Cairo: The Remarkable Apparition of Our Lady of Zeitoun

The Marian apparition known as Our Lady of Zeitoun is one of the most fascinating events in modern Coptic Orthodox history. Unlike many other Marian apparitions, this one didn’t happen in a remote village to a select few. It happened in the bustling city of Cairo, Egypt, and was witnessed by tens of thousands of people over a period of years. The story of Our Lady of Zeitoun brings together mystery, hope, and a sense of wonder that transcends denominational lines, drawing Muslims, Christians, skeptics, and believers alike.

The Setting: Zeitoun, Cairo

The apparition took place in Zeitoun, a district of Cairo known for its strong Coptic Christian community. The site itself was the Coptic Orthodox Church of St. Mary, a humble church that, according to local tradition, stood along the route the Holy Family took during their flight into Egypt. This church, with its distinctive dome and towers, became the focal point for a series of events that would captivate Egypt and the world.

The First Sightings: A Surprising Appearance

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Tasbeha
The Coptic Tradition of Midnight Praises

Often held on Saturday nights before Sunday’s Divine Liturgy, Tasbeha connects worshippers with ancient Christian roots and the monastic tradition, while also sharing resonant elements with other liturgical practices.

The Structure of Tasbeha: A Hymn of Praise

The word Tasbeha itself means “praise,” and it’s not only a title but a purpose. Tasbeha follows a consistent structure that guides worshippers through stages of prayer, each with its own deep meaning and purpose. The service generally begins with the First Hoos, which includes portions from the Song of Moses in Exodus 15, recounting God’s victory over Pharaoh and the salvation of His people. This part of the service calls to mind the power of God in delivering His people from bondage—a theme echoed in the prayers of thanksgiving within Tasbeha.

This continues with the Second Hoos from Psalm 135, known as the “Praise the Lord” psalm, and the Third Hoos, which is the Song of the Three Holy Youths from the book of Daniel. The Third Hoos is particularly beloved because it celebrates God’s protection and steadfastness, recalling the story of the three youths in the fiery furnace. Just as God preserved these saints, Tasbeha reminds worshippers of His enduring faithfulness.

The service moves into the Fourth Hoos, which incorporates various Psalms. This is followed by the Theotokia—hymns that honor the Virgin Mary. The Theotokia reflects on her unique role in salvation history, as the one who bore God incarnate. Throughout the service, worshippers also chant the Doxologies (prayers of glorification) and conclude with hymns in praise of Christ, celebrating His role as Redeemer and Lord.

Roots in Scripture and Monasticism

Tasbeha has deep scriptural roots, as shown in the themes drawn from Exodus, Psalms, and Daniel. This focus on scripture reflects a shared reverence for holy texts seen across Orthodox Christian and Jewish traditions. Much like Jewish synagogue services, which feature psalms and scripture readings central to worship, Tasbeha takes scriptural passages and reimagines them as songs of praise, intended to unite worshippers with the events, heroes, and faith in God represented in these stories.

Tasbeha’s current form developed largely within the monastic tradition, beginning as an extension of the monastic hours and particularly the Midnight Hour. Monastics in the deserts of Egypt would gather for all-night vigils, chanting Psalms and hymns as a means of continual praise. In this way, Tasbeha embodies the spirit of monasticism within parish life, calling each worshipper to a practice of prayer, praise, and meditation on God’s works.

Hymns and Chants: Elevating the Heart

Central to Tasbeha is its music—a tapestry of hymns and chants performed in the traditional Coptic language. The hymns are not simply sung; they are carefully chanted, often with complex melodies that create an atmosphere of reverence and awe. The melodies are slow, repetitive, and contemplative, inviting worshippers to meditate deeply on the words. This practice shares similarities with other forms of Orthodox and even Jewish worship, where chant serves to elevate the words, creating a spiritual experience that transcends ordinary speech.

A unique aspect of Coptic chant is its varied tempo. Some hymns are slow and solemn, while others, especially those toward the end of Tasbeha, are faster and more jubilant. The idea is to progress from contemplation to celebration, as if the soul is being lifted through different stages of joy in God’s presence. This pattern reflects the journey from preparation to union with God—a concept familiar in other liturgical traditions but expressed uniquely in the rhythm and style of Coptic music.

The Role of the Congregation: Participation in Praise

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals